The music industry has been rocked by allegations that an American singer used AI and bots to manipulate streaming platforms, fraudulently inflating his stats and earning millions in royalties. Michael Smith, 52, from North Carolina, faces charges of wire fraud, conspiracy, and money laundering in what authorities claim is the first large-scale streaming scam involving AI.
The Allegations
According to an unsealed indictment, Smith allegedly distributed hundreds of thousands of AI-generated tracks across multiple streaming platforms. Automated bots streamed these tracks—sometimes up to 10,000 streams simultaneously—to artificially boost play counts. Over several years, Smith reportedly amassed more than $10 million in illegal royalties.
Read also: 5 Easy SaaS Ideas You Can Steal to Make Good Money in 2025
U.S. Attorney Damian Williams condemned the scheme, emphasizing the financial harm caused to legitimate artists, songwriters, and rights holders. “Smith took millions that should have gone to real musicians,” Williams said.
The investigation, spearheaded by the FBI, revealed that Smith began collaborating with the CEO of an undisclosed AI music firm in 2018. This partnership provided Smith with thousands of AI-generated tracks monthly. In return, Smith supplied metadata, such as song titles and artist names, and shared a portion of the fraudulent earnings.
Emails presented in the indictment underscore the deliberate nature of the operation. One exchange from 2019 reveals the unnamed CEO describing their output as “instant music,” acknowledging its departure from genuine artistry. By 2023, Smith reportedly boasted that his AI-generated tracks had amassed over 4 billion streams and $12 million in royalties.
Industry Disruption and Ethical Concerns
Smith’s case is part of a broader trend where AI technologies are used to disrupt the music industry. Platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and YouTube have strict policies against artificial streams, as such practices undermine the integrity of royalties and the efforts of real creators. For instance, Spotify penalizes labels or distributors if fraudulent streams are detected, and tracks can only earn royalties if they meet platform criteria.
Yet, the rise of AI-generated music poses additional challenges. Tools capable of creating music, text, and images are raising concerns about copyright infringement and fair compensation. AI systems often draw from content posted online, potentially using work created by musicians without their consent.
The Broader Debate Around AI and Music
The tension between AI advancements and the music industry came to a head in 2023 when an AI-generated track mimicking the voices of Drake and The Weeknd went viral. The track’s removal by streaming platforms highlighted the growing threat of unauthorized AI-generated content.
Earlier this year, prominent artists including Billie Eilish, Elvis Costello, and members of Aerosmith signed an open letter urging the industry to address what they called the “predatory” use of AI tools. This call to action reflects widespread concern over the potential devaluation of human creativity in music.
Legal and Ethical Implications
If convicted, Smith faces significant prison time. His case also serves as a wake-up call for the music industry to strengthen its defenses against AI-driven fraud. As technology continues to evolve, the industry must find ways to balance innovation with the protection of creators’ rights and earnings.
Final Thoughts
The case of Michael Smith highlights both the incredible potential and the inherent risks of AI in creative industries. While AI can democratize music creation, it also poses ethical dilemmas and financial threats to genuine artists. As the music industry grapples with these challenges, it must strike a balance between embracing innovation and safeguarding the integrity of its ecosystem.
What do you think about the impact of AI on the music industry? Let us know in the comments below.
Leave a Reply